Your Brain on Recruiting (Part 1): Fight, Flight, or Apply

Is there a science to writing a job description that doesn’t sound like corporate wallpaper?

More mirth and merriment from the dark side of the HR sun! Courtesy of those who know better - Recruiting Innovation Summit. Book your tickets now. Your therapist will be glad you did.

In this issue:

Is there a science to writing a job description that doesn’t sound like corporate wallpaper? One that cuts through the noise and grabs the attention of the right people—the ones who don’t just fill a role, but reshape it?

That question wouldn’t leave me alone. So I rolled up my sleeves, dug into the research, and started connecting dots.

Here’s part one of what surfaced.
No fluff. Just what works.

One quick ask before I start…

Know a scrappy HR Tech startup that needs to stand out in a crowded, cutthroat market? Tell them to call my people. And by my people, I mean—just send them to this website. There's a special offer waiting (but not forever). Clock’s ticking.

Now, back to the regularly scheduled newsletter...

Your Brain on Recruiting (Part 1): Fight, Flight, or Apply

Let's get one thing straight: your hiring process is a psychological battlefield. And most candidates are showing up with their brains already half-convinced that they're about to get rejected, ghosted, or humiliated.

Sound dramatic? It's not.

Neuroscience tells us that job hunting triggers the same parts of the brain as social exclusion and physical pain. The anterior cingulate cortex lights up during rejection just like it does when you stub your toe. And when you throw in long silences, cryptic job postings, and one-sided interviews, you're practically handing candidates a fight-or-flight response on a silver platter.

From the moment someone sees your job ad, their limbic system—the part of the brain wired for survival—is running the show. Are they welcome here? Are they good enough? Is this a trap?

So yeah, "candidate experience" isn't a nice-to-have. It's neuro-psychological warfare. The only question is: are you a hostage negotiator or the villain?

Let's unpack what really happens inside a candidate's brain in the sourcing and attraction phase, and how you can either reduce the threat—or add to the chaos.

First Impressions Are Brain Impressions The human brain makes snap judgments in milliseconds. That's not poetic license. It's biology.

As soon as your job post loads, the candidate's brain is scanning it for threats or rewards—a mechanism known as the SCARF model (developed by David Rock at the NeuroLeadership Institute). SCARF stands for Status, Certainty, Autonomy, Relatedness, and Fairness—five things our brains crave to feel safe and motivated. Violate any of those, and you trigger a subconscious "nope" before they even hit the scroll bar.

Vague job descriptions? That's a certainty violation—the brain goes, "What exactly am I walking into here?"

Exaggerated culture jargon? That can backfire on status and fairness—the brain's inner critic says, "This sounds fake. Probably just corporate cosplay."

Bottom line: your copy isn't just being read. It's being neuro-filtered.

So be clear. Be specific. And stop being cute for cuteness' sake. Clarity reduces threat. Ambiguity breeds cortisol.

Curiosity Is Dopamine in a Suit You want attention? Earn it. But not by yelling.

The brain is wired to seek novelty—not noise. When something unexpected shows up (a strong hook, a human voice, a story), the dopamine system kicks in, nudging us to lean in and explore. That's why a job ad that opens with "We're hiring a digital sorcerer to slay technical dragons" can be compelling—or cringe. It all depends on whether the brain senses coherence.

Use emotion, narrative, and tension, but anchor it in real information. Tell them what you do, who you serve, and what they'll build. The limbic brain will light up. That's attention. That's interest.

Just don't bait-and-switch. Because once the dopamine drops and the prefrontal cortex realizes there's no substance beneath the sizzle? You're dead in the water.

Belonging Isn't a Buzzword—It's a Neural Requirement

Humans are tribal. Always have been. Our brains literally punish us for feeling excluded.

So what does your employer brand say to underrepresented candidates, older workers, or people with non-linear backgrounds?

If it screams "Only Ivy grads need apply," or "We're just one big family that works 70 hours a week," you've already activated a social threat response. And once that kicks in, the candidate's brain is out. No motivation. No energy. No apply.

But if your language says, "We hire real humans with real lives," and backs it up with actual diversity stories, transparent benefits, and non-cookie-cutter bios? That's relatedness and fairness lighting up the reward system like a slot machine.

The brain thinks, "Hey, maybe I'd belong here." That thought alone is powerful enough to push someone from passive interest to active candidate.

Design for Lazy Brains (Because We All Have One)

Cognitive science 101: humans don't read—they skim, filter, and bounce. If your careers page looks like a legal contract or your job post is buried under seven scrolls of jargon, you're triggering cognitive overload.

When the brain has to work too hard to process something, it taps out. This is called extraneous cognitive load, and it's a conversion killer.

What helps?

  • Bullet points.

  • Plain language.

  • Mobile-friendly formatting.

  • A visible salary range (yes, really).

And for the love of all things neural—no pop-ups while they're reading the job post.

Think of your candidate as a distracted human on a couch at 11:38 PM deciding between Netflix and your application. You've got eight seconds to make them believe clicking "Apply" is easier than binging another episode. Design like you respect their time.

Trust Is a Neurochemical Transaction You don't build trust with taglines. You build it with signals.

When your job ad includes things like:

A named hiring manager,

An estimated timeline,

And real examples of what success looks like in the role…

You're triggering a dopamine drip of credibility. The brain sees certainty, fairness, and predictability—all things that lower cortisol and raise engagement.

You want more applicants? Give their brains a reason to believe you're not just another email inbox with commitment issues.

Wrapping Up: The Brain Knows Before the Candidate Does

You're not selling a job. You're selling a neural state.

And the question every candidate's brain is asking—before a single word is consciously processed—is this:

"Will I be safe here? Will I be seen here? Will I be valued here?"

If the answer is no, nothing else matters. Not your perks. Not your brand. Not your stock options.

But if the answer is yes—if your sourcing strategy, your copy, your employer brand all signal safety, reward, and inclusion—you'll stand out.

Not because your jobs are shinier. But because you made the brain feel good. And that's a sensation it never forgets.

The Comics Section

One more thing before I go...

I barely cracked the surface on this one. If a fried egg on a skillet is your brain on drugs, I started wondering—what's the perfect image for your brain in the middle of the recruitment process?

Whatever it is, I’m not done digging. I’m doubling down on this topic, which means you're getting two issues this week. Same for next.

I’ve got to get this out of my system so I can clear the runway for whatever big idea comes next.

Maybe this is my brain on writing this newsletter. 🔥

🙃 So, how am I doing? Hit reply and let me know. Or DM me on LinkedIn. All good, either way.