In this issue:

🚨 Recruiting just got disrupted—again.

A new study from MSA University and Qatar University might have just changed how we think about talent acquisition.

Their fine-tuned Phi-4 model hit a 90.62% F1 score on resume parsing—leaving generic LLMs stuck in the 60–70% range.

In plain English: AI is getting really good at understanding resumes, job descriptions, and skill data.

➤ Generic AI is out.
➤ Specialized “recruiting copilots” are in.
➤ And the HR tech arms race just got real.

We’re entering an era where “What’s your model’s F1 score?” could matter more than “Does it use AI?”

Read on.

…

The HR Blotter

The Few Who Code the Many - The global hunt for AI talent has gone feral. Every tech hub on the map is bidding for the same small army of data scientists, ML engineers, and prompt whisperers—and paychecks are exploding. It’s not a hiring wave; it’s a power grab. Companies that lock down top AI minds now will own the next decade. Everyone else will be left automating the jobs they can’t fill.

71% of Workers Are Breaking the Rules—and Building the Future - Seventy-one percent of workers are sneaking AI tools past company policy, and Microsoft’s sounding the alarm. Employees aren’t waiting for IT approval—they’re using whatever gets the job done faster, rules be damned. It’s a trust problem disguised as a tech problem. When productivity outpaces compliance, workers become their own shadow IT departments. Companies can either adapt to that reality or waste time policing the future.

AI Just Stole Half the Work—and Nobody Got Fired - Klarna’s CEO says AI cut the company’s workload in half—without a single layoff. The bots didn’t take jobs; they took the busywork. Employees now handle higher-value tasks while algorithms crunch the rest. If true, it’s a glimpse of a new labor contract—where automation doesn’t replace people, it redefines what they’re worth. But make no mistake: if AI keeps delivering this kind of efficiency, the pink slips won’t stay holstered forever.

Diversity just got budget cut - NBC just took a buzzsaw to its DEI division—roughly 150 jobs gone, and with them, the specialized desks covering Black, Latino, Asian American, and LGBTQ+ communities. The company calls it “integration.” Insiders call it erasure. Four years ago, diversity desks were the future of media. Now they’re line items in a cost-cutting spreadsheet. It’s a reminder that corporate inclusion has a short shelf life—lasting only as long as the quarterly numbers allow.

Fewer Illegals, Bigger Paychecks - ICE crackdowns on illegal highway transport are tightening the labor pool—and truckers are finally seeing paychecks rise. With undocumented drivers sidelined, carriers are scrambling to fill routes, pushing wages upward for licensed, legal operators. It’s a rare twist in the supply chain saga: enforcement, not regulation, is driving a pay bump. For once, the road favors those who stayed in their lane.

…

The Jim Stroud Podcast

Not subscribed to The Jim Stroud Podcast? Then you’ve been flying blind. Here’s a taste of what they’ve been hearing—while you’ve been missing it.

…

…

Fine-Tuned LLMs Could Upend Recruiting as We Know It

The war for talent just got a new weapon—and it doesn’t sleep, eat, or get recruiter burnout.

A research team from MSA University and Qatar University dropped a paper that’s going to make a lot of HR tech vendors sweat: “Augmented Fine-Tuned LLMs for Enhanced Recruitment Automation.”

Their premise is simple but explosive—stop using generic chatbots to do recruiter work. Start training AI models that actually understand resumes, job descriptions, and the chaos in between.

And the numbers? Brutal.

Their fine-tuned Phi-4 model hit a 90.62% F1 score, crushing generic versions that hovered in the 60–70% range. That’s not a rounding error. That’s a full-blown paradigm shift.

Generic AI Is Dead. Long Live the Recruiting Copilot.

We’ve been spoiled by generalist AIs—ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini—digital Swiss Army knives that can write haikus, debug code, and pretend to care about your cover letter. But in recruiting, that flexibility is a liability.

Resumes are weird. One candidate writes like Hemingway, another like a broken printer. Skills hide inside bullet points. Dates vanish. Context gets mangled.

Generic models don’t speak that dialect. They hallucinate. They misread. They confuse “Java” with “JavaScript” and think “project management” means you’re ready for the C-suite.

The MSA/Qatar crew took that mess personally. They fed their model a hybrid dataset—real resumes from Kaggle’s 2,400-file archive and synthetic resumes generated with DeepSeek’s monster 236-billion-parameter LLM. Every one of them translated into clean, structured JSON. No fluff, no bias, just raw skill data.

The result? A model that doesn’t just read resumes—it gets them.

LoRA and the Art of the Upgrade

Instead of rebuilding from scratch, the team used Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA)—a clever way to teach an existing model a new trade without wiping its memory. It’s like taking a philosophy major and turning them into a recruiter without four years of retraining.

They fine-tuned four heavy hitters:

• LLaMA 3.1 (8B)

• Mistral (7B)

• Phi-4 (14B)

• Gemma 2 (9B)

Each got a crash course in resume extraction—names, skills, education, experience—spit out in clean JSON for easy ATS integration.

And here’s the kicker: Phi-4, the model that hit the 90% mark, outperformed larger and newer models because it wasn’t trying to be everything to everyone. It specialized.

Why Talent Leaders Should Care (And Fast)

Let’s cut through the tech jargon. Here’s what this means if you’re in talent acquisition:

1. AI is going vertical. Forget one-size-fits-all tools. The next generation will be domain experts—recruiting copilots trained to think like your best Sourcer.

2. You’ll hire faster. Models this accurate can parse resumes, rank candidates, and pre-match skills in seconds.

3. Compliance won’t be an afterthought. Standardized JSON outputs make it easier to audit decisions for fairness and bias.

4. You’ll need new buying criteria. The question won’t be “Does it use AI?” but “What’s its F1 score on resume parsing?”

This is where it gets interesting. Once models become measurably better, buyers will stop chasing hype and start reading the fine print.

The AI Arms Race Comes to HR Tech

Every HR vendor in the game right now is running on someone else’s foundation model—OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Meta. That dependency means differentiation is paper-thin.

Fine-tuning changes that. It gives vendors a proprietary edge—custom intelligence trained on HR-specific data. Expect to see:

• Model benchmarks as marketing. “We scored 92% on resume parsing!” is about to become the new buzz line.

• Tighter data governance. Companies will want models trained on their historical data, not the open web.

• Regulatory spotlight. EEOC, GDPR, and the EU AI Act will start asking how your recruiting AI was trained—and whether it was trained responsibly.

This is where compliance meets competition. Whoever builds the most transparent, high-performing model wins the trust game.

The Future of Work Is Getting Specialized

We’re watching AI evolve the same way the workforce did during the industrial revolution—from general labor to specialized trades.

Generic AI assistants are the factory workers. Fine-tuned AIs are the skilled artisans.

In the near future, recruiters won’t just post jobs—they’ll manage a fleet of AI specialists.
One model for sourcing.
One for resume parsing.
One for bias auditing.
One for crafting personalized outreach that doesn’t sound like it came from a spam bot.

And each of those models will get sharper as they’re trained on your company’s own hiring data.

This aligns perfectly with where the labor market is already headed:

• Skills > Degrees. Fine-tuned AIs can read competencies like a recruiter with 10 years’ pattern recognition.

• Automation > Volume. Teams shrink, pipelines grow.

• Explainability > Black Box. You’ll need to show your math when AI screens out a human.

Phi-4: The Quiet Killer

Let’s pause on that 90.62% F1 score. That’s not just a stat—it’s a statement.

Generic models usually hover around 65%. That’s a coin toss with better branding. But Phi-4’s accuracy means fewer false positives, fewer missed gems, and a lot less manual cleanup.

And with only 14 billion parameters, it’s powerful but deployable—no need for a supercomputer farm. Small and mid-size firms could actually afford to use it.

In other words: the future of recruiting AI won’t just belong to enterprise players. It’ll belong to anyone smart enough to train small models well.

The Bigger Picture: Integration, Equity, and Control

The paper’s authors didn’t stop at performance. They embedded the fine-tuned models inside their MLAR (Multilayer LLM-Based Robotic Process Automation) system—an end-to-end recruiting workflow that scrapes, parses, matches, and scores candidates automatically.

Think of it as the ATS 2.0—where every data point flows through an intelligent pipeline that learns and self-corrects.

It’s also a quiet answer to one of HR’s loudest questions: Can AI make hiring more fair?
With transparent datasets and measurable outputs, fine-tuned models give us a chance to trace why a decision was made. It’s not perfect—but it’s a start.

Where This Goes Next

We’re standing at a fork in the road. One path keeps AI as a generic sidekick. The other trains it to think like a recruiter, act like an analyst, and work like a machine.

The research suggests the latter isn’t science fiction—it’s already here.

Expect a wave of niche LLM startups selling “recruitment brains” tuned for specific industries. Healthcare hiring. Tech hiring. Government clearance hiring. Each with their own training data and precision metrics.

The winners in this next era won’t be those who talk about AI.
They’ll be the ones who train it, measure it, and trust it—without losing control.

The Final Word

Fine-tuning doesn’t just make AI smarter. It makes it belong.

When a model stops hallucinating and starts understanding, you stop wasting time. You start hiring better. You build trust in the machine without surrendering the human touch.

Recruiting isn’t dying. It’s just getting rewired.

And whoever masters that wiring—vendor, employer, or AI-native recruiter—is about to own the future of work.

…

…

One more thing before I go…

When was the last time you shared this newsletter with your network? If its been a while, or never, please consider sharing it today. I want to take things to the next level and your support (and feedback) will help me do that. Thank you in advance!

And as always, hit reply and let me know how I’m doing. Or slide into my DMs as the kids say. All good.

…